Browser Use
Open-source browser automation for AI agents — the building block for anyone coding their own GTM workflows
Visit WebsiteGTM Pipeline Position
The Verdict
“Browser Use is an exciting open-source project that gives AI agents the ability to browse the web autonomously. For GTM engineers who can code, it's a powerful tool for building custom enrichment and research workflows. Not ready for non-technical users yet.”
Best For
Technical GTM teams and developers building custom AI-powered browser automation workflows
Not Great For
Non-technical sales and marketing teams — you need a developer to make this work
Overview
Browser Use is an open-source Python library and cloud platform that enables AI agents to interact with websites through browser automation. It allows LLMs to navigate, click, type, and extract data from web pages programmatically.
Developers, GTM engineers, automation builders, AI agent developers
small team (2-10)
Capabilities
Key Features
- AI-powered browser automation
- LLM agent web interaction
- Open-source Python library
- Cloud-hosted browser sessions
- Vision-based element detection
- Multi-tab support
- Cookie/session management
- Playwright-based
Benefits
- Automate any web task with AI agents
- Open source — no vendor lock-in
- Enable AI to research and extract data from any website
- Build custom GTM workflows with browser automation
Pros & Cons
Pros
- +Open source with active community (25K+ GitHub stars)
- +Clean Python API for browser automation
- +Works with any LLM provider
- +Cloud option for scaling
- +Rapidly growing project
Cons
- -Requires technical skills to implement
- -Cloud pricing not publicly documented
- -Early-stage — APIs may change
- -No native GTM integrations
- -Not a plug-and-play sales tool
Outbound Use Cases
Financials & Scale
| Plan | Price | Limits | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Source | $0 | Self-hosted, unlimited | Full browser automation, LLM integration, Python SDK |
| Cloud | Usage-based | Managed infrastructure | Hosted browser sessions, API access, Scalable |
Browser Use is open-source and free. PhantomBuster runs $69-439/mo. Apify starts at $49/mo. Clay is $149-800/mo. The catch: Browser Use requires development resources. If you have engineers, it's the most flexible and cheapest option. If you don't, PhantomBuster or Clay are worth paying for.
The Reddit Pulse
Community Pros
- +Open source browser automation for AI agents
- +Active GitHub community
- +Works with multiple LLM providers
Community Cons
- -Still early/experimental
- -Can be flaky on complex sites
- -Requires technical setup
Reddit Questions
- ? How reliable is Browser Use for web automation?
- ? Browser Use vs Playwright for AI agents?
Thinking of Switching?
Competitive Landscape
Technical Stack
Head-to-Head Comparisons
Don't practice on live leads.
Role-play Browser Use scenarios, test your outbound messaging, and refine your pitch in a safe environment.
Try SalesDojo for Free